Federal Publications logo FEDERAL
PUBLICATIONS
INC.

Navigation Bar Checkout View Cart E-mail Us Canadian Maps and Charts Books on Canada Home

The 2009 Annotated Indian Act and Related Aboriginal Constitutional Provisions

     
Format Softcover
Catalogue No. 978-0-7798-1554-8
Pages 842
Language English only
Price $90.00
  Add to Cart

Edited by Shin Imai.
Published by Carswell, 2008.

This is an annual publication. The 2009 edition was released January 2009. The 2010 edition is expected to be released in January 2010.

Description:

This updated version of the only portable annotation of the constitutional provisions relating to Aboriginal peoples includes case law on s. 35(1) (Aboriginal and Treaty rights) and s. 91(24) (division of powers) and s. 15 of the Charter (equality rights). The consolidation of the Indian Act and Regulations contains hundreds of annotations and the full texts of the Indian Oil and Gas Act and the First Nations Land Management Act. This work features a brief annual review of the law, highlights of other legislation related to Aboriginal peoples, important aboriginal cases and a summary of the most important Supreme Court of Canada cases on Aboriginal peoples.

The 2009 Annotated Indian Act and Aboriginal Constitutional Provisions contains:
  • Table of Cases
  • Indian Act
  • Selected Indian Act Regulations
  • First Nations Land Management Act
  • Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Act
  • Indian Oil and Gas Act
  • Indian Oil and Gas Regulations, 1995
  • Highlights of other relevant legislation
  • Constitution Acts
  • Royal Proclamation
  • Selected Supreme Court of Canada summaries
  • Glossary
  • Index
The 2009 edition also includes discussion of the following new cases and legislation:
  • Limitation periods
    • Papaschase Indian Band No. 136 (Descendents of) v .Canada (Attorney General), (S.C.C.): A suit by descendants of a Band that had been dissolved in 1889 was statute barred by the Saskatchewan Limitations Act as there was evidence that descendants of the Papachase Band knew about the issue in the mid seventies and made some inquiries but took no action.
    • Manitoba Métis Federation Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General (Man. Q.B.): Court dismissed a claim for a declaration that the federal and provincial governments failed to facilitate the creation of a land base for the Métis on the basis that the claim was outside the limitation period and on the basis the Métis, as a group, could not establish Aboriginal title separate from the title held from Indians.
  • Aboriginal fishing rights
    • R. v. Kapp, (S.C.C.): A federal policy that provided three First Nations with an extra day in the fishing season, was justified as an ameliorative program under section 15(2) of the Charter.
    • Lax Kw'alaams Indian Band v. Canada (Attorney General) (B.C.S.C.): There is no Aboriginal right to a commercial fishery no fiduciary duty on the part of the Crown to provide access to a commercial fishery.
  • Consultation
    • Dene Tha' First Nation v. Canada (Minister of Environment)(FCA): Informing the First Nation the day before a report on a pipeline was to be finalized does not constitute proper consultation, Tseshaht First Nation v. Huu-ay-aht First Nation, (B.C.S.C.): The court rejected an attempt by a First Nation to stop a ratification vote on a treaty by another First Nation, saying that legal rights of the first First Nation would not be compromised Musqueam Indian Band v. Canada, (FCA): No injunction for lack of consultation was issued because monetary damages would be adequate compensation for the sale of two disputed federal office buildings in downtown Vancouver.
  • Protests and Blockades
    • R. v. Manuel (BCCA):The Court of Appeal rejected the defence of colour of right and upheld convictions of members Neskonlith Band who had blockaded a road up to the Sun Peaks Resort.
    • Frontenac Ventures Corp. v. Ardoch Algonquin First Nation, (Ont.C.A.): The appeal court reversed the imposition of a six month jail sentence and hefty fine for First Nations protesting exploration for a uranium mine on disputed land.
  • Income tax
    • Large et al. v. The Queen (FCA): A promissory note for the value of investments held in a corporation was taxable as the investments were earned in the commercial mainstream.
    • Boubard v. Canada(TCC): Income earned by employees of a lumber company on land surrendered for economic development purposes were are exempt.
  • Labour relations on reserve
    • CAW-Canada, Local 444 v. Great Blue Heron Gaming Commission, (Ont. C.A.): A complex, hierarchical labour code passed by an Indian band to regulate its casino was not an expression of an Aboriginal right of self-government.
The legislation cited is current to Canada Gazette 142:21 (October 15, 2008).

 
Price and availability subject to change. Shipping and applicable taxes extra.
Questions about this product? Please e-mail us.
Last modified: November 3, 2009

Aboriginal Law
What's New · Home · Search · Books on Canada · Canadian Maps and Charts · Ordering · E-mail Us

©Federal Publications Inc., 1998 - 2009
425 University Avenue, Ste. 401, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1T6
Phone: (416) 860-1611 or toll-free 1-888-433-3782 · E-mail: info@fedpubs.com